Review Scope
Public technical material can show the problem being solved, the governance method, evidence status, issue categories, and the software boundary that separates NoDrift from dashboards, plugins, file watchers, and hidden monitors.
Technical review gives serious readers a public-safe route to the problem NoDrift is solving, the governance method, the evidence boundary, the software boundary, and the current website-level claims.
Public technical material can show the problem being solved, the governance method, evidence status, issue categories, and the software boundary that separates NoDrift from dashboards, plugins, file watchers, and hidden monitors.
Internal implementation details, exact file lists, local evidence folders, private project records, and protected operating language stay out of website pages even when the public review surface becomes more detailed.
Evidence, correction records, and limitations remain close to technical review so product claims stay matched to the verified state instead of drifting into stronger promises than the source supports.
The review route explains what happens when generated output becomes accepted project truth before source, scope, approval, and next action have been checked.
Evidence boundaries, candidate incidents, and logged issue groups remain part of the technical story rather than separate decorative proof.
Commercial and support-readiness language must match the verified publication state at the time the site is actually used publicly.