Technical Review
Technical review gives serious readers a direct route to product explanation, evidence boundaries, issue records, and the system claims that are actually supported.
What Reviewers Can Check
Review the problem NoDrift is solving, the governance method, evidence status, issue categories, and the software boundary together rather than as isolated claims.
Current System Reality
NoDrift is a governing workspace system for personal and professional AI communications, not a dashboard, plugin, executable, file watcher, offline evaluator, local RAG system, dry-run cache, simulator, or diff viewer. That boundary is part of the product explanation, not a side note.
Evidence And Issue Context
Technical review is strongest when Evidence, Correction Log, and Limitations are read together. Counts, candidate incidents, logged issue groups, and coverage limits all matter when deciding how strong a public claim really is.
What Stays Out
Exact file lists, private project records, local evidence folders, private correction records, and protected operating language stay out of the docs. Commercial terms and support-readiness language must match the verified publication state before they are treated as settled.