Evidence
Evidence pages show what has been reviewed, what the current counts are, and where the limits still matter.
Evidence is useful when the whole picture stays together: reviewed volume, confirmed results, candidates, correction groups, and limits.
Current Snapshot
The current reported snapshot is June 10, 2026: 243 Codex Analytics threads, 1,978 turns, 0 confirmed drift, 1 candidate incident under review, 6 logged issue groups, and incomplete audit coverage.
Visible Limits
NoDrift evidence is meant to keep uncertainty visible. Missing weeks are not fabricated, candidate incidents stay labeled until the evidence supports a final classification, and confirmed zeros do not erase incomplete coverage.
Counts Need Context
The evidence model separates dated snapshots, candidate status, issue groups, and coverage limits instead of presenting a clean count as if it already proved complete review. Evidence works best when it stays near correction records, technical review, and explicit limitations.
Confident mapping still needs source truth.
Story problem: The team accepted wrong event mapping without verified source truth.
NoDrift answer: NoDrift keeps claims tied to what was actually checked, while unverified areas stay visible instead of being buried in confident language.
Sales copy cannot outrun the product.
Story problem: The AI rewrote the page as if the portal were production-ready.
NoDrift answer: NoDrift keeps public and client-facing claims tied to what is actually built, reviewed, and approved.
Built, mocked, planned, and approved must stay separate.
Story problem: Lena had to stop coding and sort out what was built, mocked, planned, and approved.
NoDrift answer: NoDrift keeps evidence status visible so the user can tell what exists, what is draft, what is planned, and what still needs approval.
Claim Boundary
Broad claims such as every page, all files, complete, verified, ready, or public-safe require coverage evidence showing what was fully read, searched, changed, tested, or left unverified.